<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Cal Code Camp Session on Entity Framework 4.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/</link>
	<description>A glimpse into the lives of Tony &#38; Zuzana Sneed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Yes, Entity Framework is really the way of the future.  And it&#039;s looking good for the next version, which will be released in March. LINQ to SQL isn&#039;t dead, and it might work for some projects, if you can guarantee SQL Server on the back end.  But if you want the most longevity, I would recommend Entity Framework, because MS is really throwing its weight behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Entity Framework is really the way of the future.  And it&#8217;s looking good for the next version, which will be released in March. LINQ to SQL isn&#8217;t dead, and it might work for some projects, if you can guarantee SQL Server on the back end.  But if you want the most longevity, I would recommend Entity Framework, because MS is really throwing its weight behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>(SORRY, hit enter accidently) and I will be using entity framework as well because you confirmed that it will be sort of replacing LINQ and over shadowing ADO.NET Std usage ?  Did I get that correct ?

  You have a very nice looking family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(SORRY, hit enter accidently) and I will be using entity framework as well because you confirmed that it will be sort of replacing LINQ and over shadowing ADO.NET Std usage ?  Did I get that correct ?</p>
<p>  You have a very nice looking family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tonysneed.com/2009/11/18/so-cal-code-camp-session-on-entity-framework-4-0/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,
   Thanks for the talk at code camp on sunday.
   Thanks for the sample code as well.
   I am new to entity framework, but I am redoing my site with MVC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,<br />
   Thanks for the talk at code camp on sunday.<br />
   Thanks for the sample code as well.<br />
   I am new to entity framework, but I am redoing my site with MVC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
